Does on-demand caesarean section expose you to risks for subsequent pregnancies?
The issue of on-demand caesarean section has been extensively examined, not only in the obstetric gynaecological profession, but also in case law. A request for a caesarean section that comes from a patient cannot fail to be accepted or evaluated, if not contraindicated, because for every medical procedure, including a natural birth, which is a physiological event if you will, consent is required. There are cases in which there are objective medical contraindications and it must be explained to the woman why this request is not accepted. Caesarean section on demand includes 3 to 5% of deliveries in our Centres.
Today we know that vaginal birth is good for the fetus. Over the years, an opinion has been established that it is the caesarean section that is good for the fetus. This is another matter, that is, the caesarean section allows you to plan the birth in the useful time and, therefore, certainly appropriate for the fetus.
Why, then, is vaginal birth good for the fetus? Firstly, crossing the vaginal canal improves the respiratory performance of the fetus; secondly, it improves the response of the fetus's immune system, which, crossing the canal, comes into contact with the mother's microbiota. The first is clear evidence, while the second is still being studied and the evidence is getting stronger.
Why is there this tendency to prefer caesarean section? There is a problem of fear and not full awareness of the personal ability to give birth, although today there are analgesic conditions that greatly improve the compliance of vaginal delivery. In addition, the experiences of women in one's family and friends increase this fear. There is also a form of excessive protection, especially when the woman is older or has managed to get pregnant as a result of artificial insemination techniques. It is as if the baby could be better protected with a caesarean section. These are complex anthropological and psychological aspects, which must be addressed starting from the early days of pregnancy. All this leads to more subsequent caesarean sections and this exposes the mother and fetus to greater risks, both related to placental anomalies and bleeding risks.
We must start, from the first visits, with speeches to our patients that make them understand that safety in the delivery room is now at high levels both for the humanization of childbirth, which is the basis of everything, and for the application of technologies and analgesia that we have available today.
read more
-
Climate change and birth rateClimate change and fertility; A general topic for a particular problem that is still little studied and little investigated. We are all realizing how much climate change impacts our lives and how necessary it is to stem it, but few have carried out an analysis of the correlation between this phenomenon and the ability to procreate. We talk about it with Prof. Walter Ricciardi.
-
Welfare and birth rateThe Welfare State, developed since the nineteenth century to mitigate social risks such as unemployment and illness, has contributed significantly to the lengthening of the average life expectancy and to the change in the role of women in society. This change has influenced the traditional view of the family and has made it more difficult for women to reconcile work and family, also affecting historical birth rates. Prof. Gilberto Turati explains the current situation and the dynamics underlying it.
-
Andrological preventionWhen we talk about andrological prevention, we are probably entering a field unknown to many. Contrary to what happens for the female counterpart. In fact, the average age of the first gynecological examination is 15 years, unlike what happens in males where the first andrological specialist check-up often comes at a much older age, at the onset of clinical symptoms or when trying to get pregnant. Why is prevention important in the andrological field? This is what Dr. Carmine Bruno explains.